-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/20/2014 08:19 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:55:02PM -0500, Jon wrote: >>>> >>>> These packages could have dependencies on other packages >>>> which are essential to that product's identity (like ye olde >>>> dreaded "redhat-lsb", I suppose), and could either contain >>>> systemd presets appropriate for that product -- or perhaps >>>> better, could depend on another (for example) >>>> fedora-presets-server package. >>>> >>> >>> Same as above, keep the systemd preset files out of the >>> release package, but feel free to add whatever requirements >>> make sense. > I think this shows that the idea of allowing multiple > fedora-release-<variant> packages to be installed is going to drive > people crazy. Even a simple question which set of presets is active > will not be easy to answer. I think that installing packages from > multiple products should be fine in general, but the branding and > defaults should be exclusive. > For the record, this part of the question was settled already. We agreed between WGs that there is *no* expectation that we will have multiple Products installed on a system at the same time (effectively that fedora-release-$PRODUCT must conflict with all Products). This will ensure that defaults will be consistent throughout the installation's lifecycle (or at least until the admin explicitly chooses to remove/replace the Product-specific release file). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOmzAIACgkQeiVVYja6o6MJ5gCeMcCAHza/2xK9U0nMlFvjAgfK hIcAn36yLQ3aPcBomyZvBzWFJgISHu0+ =2ptQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
