Re: Proposal: time to set up the fedora-release-{cloud, workstation, server} subpackages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/18/2014 10:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I also suggest that /etc/os-release be switched using the alternatives
> system (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives), with the
> variant in either the VERSION field (VERSION="21 (Cloud)") or a new
> os-release field which we would propose -- probably VARIANT. 
> 
> I suppose /etc/issue and /etc/issue.net would also be candidates for
> alternatives.

I would like to hear what Lennart Poettering and other systemd folks
have to say about /etc/os-release handling in the light of the stateless
systems blog post from yesterday:

http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/stateless.html


> Volunteers to implement?

I can take care of creating the release package for the Workstation product.

-- 
Kalev
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux