On 20. 6. 2014 at 12:29:32, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 20.06.2014 12:23, schrieb Jan Zelený: > > On 20. 6. 2014 at 11:22:15, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> Am 20.06.2014 09:11, schrieb Jan Zelený: > >>> On 19. 6. 2014 at 14:24:39, Jon wrote: > >>>>> and BTW i am not playing around that much on my Rawhide VM but had > >>>>> *two times* today by type "dnf whatever" the "there is already an > >>>>> instance, wating for PID..." nonsense caused by the background > >>>>> metadata refresh > >>>>> > >>>>> do you *really* think that's a good user-expierience? > >>>> > >>>> No, that is unfortunate, and probably user unfriendly. > >>> > >>> While I agree that the user experience is not pleasant, you are talking > >>> about rawhide. I'd like to ask you not to use rawhide as a reference. We > >>> never intended to optimize dnf for the rawhide use case which is > >>> different in so many ways compared to stable Fedoras > >> > >> that is not matter of rawhide or not and has nohting to do with usecases > > > > Actually it has everything to do with rawhide. On normal distribution you > > will not see that lock that often because the metadata doesn't change > > that often and it doesn't need to be re-downloaded multiple times a day > > how does it know that? Checksums. Thanks Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
