Once upon a time, David <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> said: > Excuse me. By now I doubt anyone but the Yum zealots really care. Just > do it. Make the switch. The Yum zealots will find something else to > complain about later. Perhaps the size of the default font? :-) Please do not call people that like command consistency "zealots". >From a system administration point of view, if dnf implements largely the same common command interface as yum, it would be MUCH better if it the command-line utility continues to be "yum". It was annoying when we went from "up2date" to "yum", but there was good reason (they were not at all CLI-compatible). If the common (aka commonly-scripted) CLI commands are the same, especially "<foo> install <package>" and "<foo> upgrade", it would be much nicer to people that manage dozens or hundreds of servers (where they won't all be upgraded in the same time frame) to NOT arbitrarily change the name. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
