Re: dnf replacement for yum-cron

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:06:45PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > That's not the most descriptiony of all descriptions ever, but if the name
> > is any indication, it is just a thing which keeps the cache up to date.
> > yum-cron can actually apply updates  [....]
> That sounds dangerous ... updates are not really atomic (i.e not at
> all) doing them silently in the background is a very bad idea.

Yet, it works pretty well most of the time. I've done it at decent scale on
production machines with no real issues -- and, most critically, with
*fewer* issues than on unpatched systems.

Real issues do _occasionally_ occur, but so do bad disks, failed ram, bad
offline updates, etc., etc. Fear over lack of atomicity is letting "it's not
perfect!" get in the way of real world usefulness.

Additionally, these updates aren't _silent_ -- they're logged and there's an
e-mailed report.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux