On 12. 6. 2014 at 11:41:52, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 17:13 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > 2014-06-12 17:03 GMT+02:00 Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Jan Zelený wrote: > > >> We are on the same page, thanks for your input. > > > > > > I don't think so. You are clearly arguing for a temporary compatibility > > > wrapper but eventually forcing everyone to use dnf as the command. The > > > other side is wanting yum to continue to remain the name for the command > > > with yum-legacy for temporary transition. In otherwords, dnf is an > > > internal project name and doesn't need to be exposed to the user. > > > > There are not only two sides :) I don’t insist on dnf being a hidden > > “internal project name”; introducing new features (only?) under the dnf > > name is fine with me. I do object to planning to unnecessarily break the > > yum commands for which we actually have compatibility. > > We can keep the yum symlink forever... Definitely, we do no insist on removing it. I am perfectly fine with removing it some time far in the future when nobody uses it any more. Thanks Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
