2014-06-12 17:03 GMT+02:00 Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx>:
There are not only two sides :) I don’t insist on dnf being a hidden “internal project name”; introducing new features (only?) under the dnf name is fine with me. I do object to planning to unnecessarily break the yum commands for which we actually have compatibility.On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:We are on the same page, thanks for your input.
I don't think so. You are clearly arguing for a temporary compatibility wrapper but eventually forcing everyone to use dnf as the command. The other side is wanting yum to continue to remain the name for the command with yum-legacy for temporary transition. In otherwords, dnf is an internal project name and doesn't need to be exposed to the user.
Mirek
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
