> > We are open to ideas. I think in this situation there is no perfect way > > how to satisfy everyone. We have thought about this for several months. > > Renaming dnf back to yum might seem like the best option at first (it was > > our original plan too) but when you carefully and deeply think about > > this, keeping dnf and yum separate is really the least painful choice. So > > far I haven't seen a single strong argument against it that would satisfy > > needs of all the involved stakeholders. > > Well having user that upgrade have a different package manager then > those who install new is not only "not perfect" but a no go. > Simple obsolete yum so that dnf gets pulled in on upgrades and have > rename the yum package to yum-legacy or something and have users that > want it for whatever reason install it by hand. I think this is is alignment with what I said before - yum and dnf will still stay separated and dnf is not renamed. So if there is no argument against your proposal, we might as well give it a shot. Thanks Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
