Hi, On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:40 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:19 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:56 +0200, drago01 wrote: > > > > > > > Oh and xserver really .. I am the one that gets complaints from users > > > > that I can't fix because of our ancient x11 stack. > > > > > > I'm not intrinsically _opposed_ to rebasing X in F20. But it's not > > > something we've done in any previous Fedora, and there are enough nvidia > > > users out there that I'd want to be cautious about not breaking them > > > more than we need to. > > > > > > If That Other Repo doesn't have a problem with getting builds lined up > > > for nvidia/fglrx/whatever I'd be much more willing to do X rebases in > > > existing releases. About the other repo rpmfusion, we just need some time on updates-testing to rebuild all drives , but I can ask for more details on rpmfusion mailing list . > It's still tricky for things like the xwayland/gnome > > > lockstep, but I think we know how to handle that. > > > > Hi, why not begin by a xserver rebase in copr ? > > Personally, because I don't feel like doing the work twice. But if > someone else wants to, sure, go for it. the most important thing, for me, is understand what is your opinion (X team) about testing Xserver 1.15 , It is worth testing Xserver 1.15, or we should focus on 1.16 ? and sorry about my bad English Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
