On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:19 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:56 +0200, drago01 wrote: > > > > > Oh and xserver really .. I am the one that gets complaints from users > > > that I can't fix because of our ancient x11 stack. > > > > I'm not intrinsically _opposed_ to rebasing X in F20. But it's not > > something we've done in any previous Fedora, and there are enough nvidia > > users out there that I'd want to be cautious about not breaking them > > more than we need to. > > > > If That Other Repo doesn't have a problem with getting builds lined up > > for nvidia/fglrx/whatever I'd be much more willing to do X rebases in > > existing releases. It's still tricky for things like the xwayland/gnome > > lockstep, but I think we know how to handle that. > > Hi, why not begin by a xserver rebase in copr ? Personally, because I don't feel like doing the work twice. But if someone else wants to, sure, go for it. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct