Re: pvm packaging guidelines violations?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Susi Lehtola
<jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:45:11 -0500
> Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> First let me say that if anyone wants to be the primary maintainer of pvm
>> please step up! I only need it as a dependency.
>
> What package are you referring to?

I co-maintain pvm with Richard because it's a dependency for mplayer
in RPM Fusion.

If we could build mplayer without pvm support, I would certainly be
all for that.

- Ken
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux