Am 05.05.2014 22:19, schrieb Simo Sorce: > On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 22:03 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers: >>>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> And calling /usr/libexec "Fedora-only" is of course kind of >>>>> funny. >>>> >>>> "libexec" is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB >>>> allowed it. >> >>> you systemd-guys are really funny - /run was okay and FHS did >>> not matter because it don't get often enough updates and was in >>> your way, libexec is not OK because you don't like itand prefer >>> to fix things which ain't broken - wheter it's part of a proposed >>> FHS update and from where it comes >> >> It is not about being funny, it is about making reasonable decisions. >> /run solved a huge old problem, libexec is pointless and only creates >> needless and nothing but annoying differences. > > It's a practical way to keep helpers out of path and autocomplete > without polluting /usr/lib[64] and having to deal with multilib issues, > what's pointless about it? that it was not proposed by systemd-upstream (sorry could not resist)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
