On Fri, 02.05.14 10:53, Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > He also writes "particularly since it appears to have been > > developed without the input of the journald creators". The code in > > question has been reviewed on the systemd mailing list, and > > discussed internally. Also, although I didn't have anything to do > > with initial journald creation, I have been one the people handling > > bugs and adding features to it over the last two years. > > This was an impression I got from the discussion thread up to that > point. I didn't get a sense that the core journald developers were in > agreement with this as the approach (and as noted above, it appeared > that this was being pushed as the One True Way to do this). Wut? I think Zibigniew and I are actually very much on the same page. Zbigniew is a systemd commiter, I trust him, and I think it's good stuff he is doing. We have discussed the protocol choices many times within the systemd community and we are all behind this approach. I am pretty sure HTTP(s) is the right choice, and that we cover both push and pull models, and Zbigniew's brings us a good step closer to that goal, even if it might not bring us all the way there yet. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
