Am 25.04.2014 19:30, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > 2014-04-25 12:40 GMT+02:00 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": > Which is what we care about we cannot hold back progress in the distribution based on someone, someplace, > somewhere might be using legacy cruff. > > It's better for everybody they themselves included that they maintain those packages or components within > Fedora itself or those individuals or company's will need to adapt they themselves to our changes when we make > them. > That's certainly an option but it's not the only one; see the recent "Functional" threads for example. > > For LSB, there is an /explicit promise/ that if a vendor does what is specified, the package will be possible to > install and will run correctly. We do, of course, have the option to repudiate LSB and explicitly say we don't > care for future releases. > > And it's not only commercial software; private projects that make no sense to publish (such as a company's web > site) are equally affected such changes. Simply spoken, if we care only about package in Fedora, we are building an > appliance; if we want to build an operating system, we do need to cater for software not included directly in the repo *thank you* for that words!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
