Am 25.04.2014 12:58, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: > On 04/25/2014 10:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 25.04.2014 12:40, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: >>> On 04/24/2014 04:30 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >>>> Only those that are maintained directly inside Fedora. >>> Which is what we care about we cannot hold back progress in the >>> distribution based on someone, someplace, somewhere might be using >>> legacy cruff >> >> have you ever heard "if it ain't broken don't fix it" >> network.service works fine until someone decides to break it intentionally > > Completely Irrelevant to my response since what I was referring to was > components maintained outside Fedora. when i have learned something than if someone in context of Fedora development uses words like "legacy cruff" and "deprecate" that the next step is try to remove and no longer support it there is a reason why i get alarmed by the word "legacy"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
