Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 21 Changes - weeks 13/14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2014-04-07, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 07.04.14 15:00, Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>> * PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services
>>>   URL:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PrivateDevicesAndPrivateNetwork
>>>   Announcement: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/197175.html
>>>
> [...]
>> To answer this: the kernel network namespace thing PrivateNetwork= is
>> built on disconnects all address families at once. There's no choice to
>> only disassociate some address families, either all or none. (except for
>> the weirdness of AF_UNIX sockets in the fs namespace which stay
>> connectable as long as the fs is reachable, see feature page).
>>
> What about D-Bus? D-Bus uses AF_UNIX currently. But as you can know,
> there is an aim to move D-Bus to a new protocol family. Is it possible that
> all the daemons with a D-Bus control interface will stop work then?

If you mean kdbus, it is not related to network, it is based on
character devices.

Kay
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux