On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2014-04-07, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, 07.04.14 15:00, Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: >>> * PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services >>> URL: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PrivateDevicesAndPrivateNetwork >>> Announcement: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/197175.html >>> > [...] >> To answer this: the kernel network namespace thing PrivateNetwork= is >> built on disconnects all address families at once. There's no choice to >> only disassociate some address families, either all or none. (except for >> the weirdness of AF_UNIX sockets in the fs namespace which stay >> connectable as long as the fs is reachable, see feature page). >> > What about D-Bus? D-Bus uses AF_UNIX currently. But as you can know, > there is an aim to move D-Bus to a new protocol family. Is it possible that > all the daemons with a D-Bus control interface will stop work then? If you mean kdbus, it is not related to network, it is based on character devices. Kay -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
