Re: When a yum update sets up an MTA ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:33:12 -0700
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On 04/21/2014 03:44 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >> Would it
> >> make sense to audit all spec files to look for instances of
> >> 'systemctl.*enable'?
> >
> >
> > I'm attaching the hits for that pattern on the actual RPM scripts
> > in Fedora rawhide (x86_64).  This combines both regular scripts and
> > trigger scripts. I can add additional columns with more
> > information, but the text file will become a bit unwieldy.
> 
> Time to file a bunch of bugs?  I can do it, but if someone has
> scripts, that could help.

Please please please see: 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mass_bug_filing
before you go filing any bugs. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux