Re: When a yum update sets up an MTA ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/21/2014 03:44 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> Would it
>> make sense to audit all spec files to look for instances of
>> 'systemctl.*enable'?
>
>
> I'm attaching the hits for that pattern on the actual RPM scripts in Fedora
> rawhide (x86_64).  This combines both regular scripts and trigger scripts.
> I can add additional columns with more information, but the text file will
> become a bit unwieldy.

Time to file a bunch of bugs?  I can do it, but if someone has
scripts, that could help.

Are there any currently supported upgrade paths from sysv to systemd
for any of these services?  If F19 already had all of these, then it
may make sense to just remove the migration code.

--Andy
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux