On 04/15/2014 03:40 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
Dne 11.4.2014 16:59, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Create new set of packages and introduce proper versioning
in order to not confuse the dynamic linker.
Is this symbol versioning intended to be upstream?
Ideally, yes, but given the upstream willingness to incorporate
community-proposed changes, I fear that we may in fact introduce
downstream symbol versioning.
There is support for appending a unique suffix to all exported symbols.
See @DB_VERSION_UNIQUE_NAME@ in the sources. It is not ELF symbol
versioning, but it might help.
The conflict between development packages remains, though.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
