Re: F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 11.4.2014 16:59, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
> Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
>> == Scope ==
>> * Proposal owners: Create new set of packages and introduce proper versioning 
>> in order to not confuse the dynamic linker.
> 
> Is this symbol versioning intended to be upstream?

Ideally, yes, but given the upstream willingness to incorporate
community-proposed changes, I fear that we may in fact introduce
downstream symbol versioning.
The fact is that in order to reliably provide both library versions, we
*need* the symbol versioning - preferably upstream, but if it won't be
possible, we will have to version downstream (or find another solution
to this problem).

I will contact the upstream about this.

-- 
Jan Stanek - Red Hat Associate Developer Engineer - Databases Team
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux