On 04/11/2014 07:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
You are coming to this conclusion how exactly?
The baseWG having to send special endorsement of the proposal in their name.
So let's just clear this matter once and for all...
Is the baseWG supposed to be responsible for the decisions and direction
and the length of maintenance of those 1806 components they self defined
as a part of the baseWG?
Simple yes or no official response from those driving the .next or wg
effort and or FESCo will suffice.
That answer will also answer some of the larger questions that have been
conveniently left out of those driving the .next and wg effort.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
