On 04/11/2014 04:18 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: The securetty file is empty by default =
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
>
>Change owner(s): quickbooks<quickbooks.office@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>The securetty file is empty by default
>
>There's on-going discussion for this Change on the devel list.
>https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-April/197344.html
Fedora Base Working Group discussed this Change on today's meeting
(2014-04-11) and tends to support counter proposal to remove securetty
entirely from the default PAM configuration (not from distribution)
as discussed in the thread mentioned above. Base WG would like to ask
FESCo to weight it as part of decision making (once this change hits
FESCo meeting).
Just so it's clear the WG's have now been granted weight in power to
influence FESCo processes and decision distribution wide, more so then
non product specific contributors and participants hence forcing
contributors to seek their approval and accepted as well FESCo.
Just a heads up so people are aware of that when maintaining or planing
to work on components that make up the core/baseOS layer or components
that are depended upon it.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
