On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 16:10 +0930, William Brown wrote: > A system wide resolver I am not opposed to. I am against a system wide > *caching* resolver. > In this case, a cache *is* helpful, as is DNSSEC. But for the other 6, a > cache is a severe detriment. About the above 2, can you explain *why* ? A bunch of people here, feel that it would be a great improvement, you keep saying it is doomsday, yet I haven't seen a concise explanation of why that would be (maybe I overlooked, apologies if so). > I disable the DNS cache in firefox with developer tools. So you will be able to do the same by setting 1 configuration option in unbound, or you could disable the resolver entirely. Can you tell why *everybody* should have the cache disabled by default ? > Additionally, a short TTL is good, for this situation, but it can't fix > everything. Paul mentioned the single configuration option need to make your resolver tweak the TTL locally, what else do you need ? And again why your preference should be the default ? What compelling arguments can you make ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
