Re: default local DNS caching name server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Saturday, 12 April 2014 3:55 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I think there needs to be more emphasis on the /other/ benefit, the
> whole reason I brought this up this time:

  Sure; I tried to cover it in the detailed description as

===
...Apart from trust, these name servers are often known to be flaky and unreliable. Which only adds to the overall bad and at times even frustrating user experience. In such a situation, having a trusted local DNS resolver not only makes sense but is in fact badly needed. It has become a need of the hour. (See: [1], [2], [3]) 
===

Also, this thread is linked there at [3].
---
Regards
   -Prasad
http://feedmug.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux