> However, earlier this year it also started using another, as far as I > know locally created buildsystem. "GN" at first was not buildable from > source at all. However, it seems that they have improved this and you > can now build it from source on x86_64 (only). That sounds problematic - why x86_64 only? Hopefully that could be fixed? BTW shake [1] seems to be able to handle ninja [2]. I posted a review request for it recently. [3] > So, aside the bundling, chromium has other issues. Would a package that > doesn't build from source be allowed in the playground repo? (ie, uses > downloaded GN binaries to build) I would say no. Playground should only contain packages built fully from source. So if chromium is only buildable from source for x86_64 currently then so be it. Jens [1] https://github.com/ndmitchell/shake/blob/master/README.md [2] https://github.com/ndmitchell/shake/blob/master/docs/Ninja.md [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082515 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
