-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/08/2014 05:36 AM, Jens Petersen wrote: > I own some packages in EPEL what have been retired for a while from > Fedora, but I want to re-introduce to Fedora. I have a question > about this: > > Do retired Fedora packages which are still active/exist in EPEL > require a re-review to be unretired in Fedora? > > Until now I assumed the answer was yes, but I thought I better > check to be sure to avoid wasted review effort. > The retirement process mandates that if a package has been retired from Fedora, it needs a re-review before it can be included again. It has an exception to bypass this if it's still supported in another branch, but my interpretation would be that this means another *Fedora* branch and that EPEL wouldn't qualify. So I'd say you should go through the review (and as a side-effect, a reviewer may discover things you can use to clean up the EPEL package as well) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlND4r4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6NWhQCeJe87BQESGAGfosgdtIBBh9YI 3wcAoJWYTXXgvHzxMZUaETksqmBUAzeC =5BUH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
