On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:15:59PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> "lbzip2" was the fastest compressor and decompressor in all tests.
> It the best command for interactive use.
>
> "lbzip2 -u" always produced smallest files (even smaller than bzip2)
> while consuming the least amount of resources (CPU power and memory).
> This directly translates to lowest bills in cloud, which makes "lbzip2
> -u" the best choice here.
But... the size difference in your test cases appear to be 0.1% and
0.02%. Am I reading that right? And, compressing linux-3.12.6.tar with xz
instead of bzip2 gives a 15.6%, or with xz -9, 19.7%. Of course, that's very
slow, and the other resource factors are important too. (And lbzip2 is
impressively fast.)
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Tepid change for the somewhat better!"
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
