Once upon a time, Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > lbzip2 does not (at least not yet) provide interfaces of libbz2 library, > only command line tools. This Change does *not* affect users of libbz2. Is there enough of a gain to the system to only partially replace a core program like this (especially with alternatives)? This seems like a case where either we get a "new and improved and replaces the old" version (where the new one just obsoletes the old one, such as the jpeg-turbo change), or just leave it alone. Please understand, I don't mean to "attack" you or your code. I just think adding a second implementation of a core utility like bzip2 is a bad idea unless there is a significant gain. If there's a point where lbzip2 can fully replace bzip2 (so all CLI and API uses), and there are good benefits, then Fedora should just replace the old implementation with a new one. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
