Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, "What's Happening?")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> 
> On 03/31/2014 12:38 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Workstation will require this too.  Having it be in Base is a good idea.
> 
> If there emerges a WG that does not require this from WG then what and
> was not base limiting itself to it's already defined package set?

Base is common platform for products but it does not mean everything has
to be used by other products or everything has to follow base path (for
example installer is part of Base as we agreed but it can diverge a lot
over products, and even it would not be used in all products explicitely
just to provide images - cloud). Of course if some technology gets
obsoleted/deprecated by most of products, it means the time to deprecate
it in Base comes (or change of the owner). So common sense, not exact
numbers :).

Jaroslav

> 
> JBG
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux