Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part II, "What's Happening?")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/31/2014 12:38 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Workstation will require this too.  Having it be in Base is a good idea.

If there emerges a WG that does not require this from WG then what and was not base limiting itself to it's already defined package set?


JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux