Hi, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:13:24AM +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: >> If those packages are still not following current packaging guidelines >> then they should not be closed otherwise what is the use of FPC and >> their work, meetings, updating wiki pages all these efforts will be of >> no use then for existing packages in Fedora. FPC work will remain only >> for newer package submissions. > > The presence of these bugs tells you nothing about the quality of > those packages. Also it doesn't tell you about other packages that > might have passed the review 5+ years ago, but since then fallen out > of compliance with the guidelines. > This looks like a general opinion on package reviews and not about merge-reviews. Why can't we consider them like as a new reviews? and why people so against merge-review just because we got those packages already in Fedora? > This is where having some sort of automated testing of all packages > would be good (perhaps running fedora-review over packages, as was > suggested in this thread already). That will be a welcome move but again will maintainers read those reviews and work on to fix any reported issues? > FWIW, Debian does this already: http://lintian.debian.org/ Those who want to see all the automated work, keep looking into https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Changes_Drafts/Automated_packages_review_tools Regards, Parag. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
