On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:13:24AM +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > If those packages are still not following current packaging guidelines > then they should not be closed otherwise what is the use of FPC and > their work, meetings, updating wiki pages all these efforts will be of > no use then for existing packages in Fedora. FPC work will remain only > for newer package submissions. The presence of these bugs tells you nothing about the quality of those packages. Also it doesn't tell you about other packages that might have passed the review 5+ years ago, but since then fallen out of compliance with the guidelines. This is where having some sort of automated testing of all packages would be good (perhaps running fedora-review over packages, as was suggested in this thread already). FWIW, Debian does this already: http://lintian.debian.org/ Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
