Il 21/mar/2014 12:59 "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:28:26AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> > I agree with Jaroslav. I was looking forward to have a fourth
> > product to those three. KDE can help define what is needed for new
> > product, what must be done by all teams, how much work it will be
> > ... I guess we should speak more about addition of new product and
> > don't kill the idea at the start.
>
> Like I said, I'm skeptical, but listening. :)
>
> --
> Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I think the same, if all spins become products we can also keep the actual way. Fedora.next is a very good idea and I'm sure it will have success, but it needs to follow his strategy with three different products, not having 2 different ones and *n* workstation-similar-products, IMHO.
I don't think spins are not useful, but they could be under the wing of Workstation as a sub-product perhaps.
This is how I understand and think about fedora.next, so proliferation of products is not really what it should be in my eyes.
Greetings
Robert Mayr
(robyduck)
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
