----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:55:34AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > One possible fix would be to rename 'qt' back to 'qt4' explicitly > > That will have to happen soon anyway, with the move to Qt 5. > > Is qt5 going to be shifted to be packaged as generic qt? Is there value in > doing that over leaving it versioned? Versioned. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 for discussion (unless something changes I missed). R. > -- > Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
