On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:55:34AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > One possible fix would be to rename 'qt' back to 'qt4' explicitly > That will have to happen soon anyway, with the move to Qt 5. Is qt5 going to be shifted to be packaged as generic qt? Is there value in doing that over leaving it versioned? -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
