Re: fail2ban + firewalld suggestions needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19 March 2014 19:23, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 19.03.2014 20:21, schrieb Jonathan Underwood:
>> On 19 March 2014 19:16, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> but with not take care of it you would end in having firewalld as mandatory
>>> dependency which is the main point of that thread - there are still way
>>> too much circular dependencies making it hard to strip down a setup
>>
>> I didn't advocate having fail2ban having a hard Requires for
>> firewalld, nor anything else creating a "circular dependence". I was
>> simply advocating having a configuration file that would work for the
>> most common case
>
> and what installs that config file is the question and how

The main package.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux