Am 19.03.2014 20:21, schrieb Jonathan Underwood: > On 19 March 2014 19:16, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> but with not take care of it you would end in having firewalld as mandatory >> dependency which is the main point of that thread - there are still way >> too much circular dependencies making it hard to strip down a setup > > I didn't advocate having fail2ban having a hard Requires for > firewalld, nor anything else creating a "circular dependence". I was > simply advocating having a configuration file that would work for the > most common case and what installs that config file is the question and how sub-packages are done with care since there are no soft Requires
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
