On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 20:40 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Am 10.03.2014 20:18, schrieb drago01: > >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3f3333b8666c1244e215a6aa2 > >>> > >>> how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during basic > >>> document manipulation" for packages which are not installable at all due > >>> dependencie problems? > >> > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mesa-10.0.3-1.20140206.fc20 > >> ... again broken dep and someone gave it +1 regardless. You should > >> know that "someone" very well ;) > >> > >> Now seriously auto qa detected the broken dep. Maybe it should give > >> negative karma even if there are false positives a wrong negative > >> karma is not the end of the world ... > > > > yes i know that one well, that's why that one notified > > here that rebuilds are needed > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066718 > > OK, but then you should undo your +1 by adding a -1 (which means 0 > instead of +1). No, it doesn't. only you last non-zero value is considered. if you file a +1 then a -1, you're counted as -1. If you file a -1 then a +1, you're counted as +1. There is no current way to change -1 or +1 to 0, which is obviously a missing feature. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
