On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3f3333b8666c1244e215a6aa2 > > how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during basic > document manipulation" for packages which are not installable at all due > dependencie problems? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mesa-10.0.3-1.20140206.fc20 ... again broken dep and someone gave it +1 regardless. You should know that "someone" very well ;) Now seriously auto qa detected the broken dep. Maybe it should give negative karma even if there are false positives a wrong negative karma is not the end of the world ... -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
