-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/10/2014 03:58 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:09:43 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi >> <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> What will fedup updates of Fedora 20 look like? Would there >>>> be a flag, e.g. --product cloud/workstation/server? If not >>>> specified do we fail, or is there a default? >>>> >>>> Or is this getting too far ahead of things? >>>> >>> The default should be whatever product was installed onto the >>> system originally. Going from Fedora 20 to a Product in F21 is >>> probably a one-off but I'm not sure what that should look like. >>> I could be totally wrong but I believe that each of the >>> Products will have their own install image. With that in mind, >>> fedup might need a one-off bit of UI to ask which Product image >>> you want to use. That image would then set the Product on the >>> disk accordingly. >> >> Or we could simply say that fedup doesn't upgrade from a non >> product to a product. You have to re-install or use a manual >> method to do that (some yum/dnf commands, etc). > > We shouldn't make things harder for users to make it easier for us > .. that's backwards. > Yeah, we really need packages to have a "true" default (which is used if no Product is specified) and then may have other Product-specific defaults. In one of my other responses to this thread, I postulated a straw-man solution for this. Feel free to bring torches :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMeG3QACgkQeiVVYja6o6MSDQCghZS7sLjBtgZ4IUK9/cT0GYmf mJ8An0HGGYW30S4GoccOfDNiTngfb9iI =fl2X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
