On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:40:29AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > At last week's FESCo meeting, the fact that Products desired to have > > divergent configuration was briefly touched on. On Thursday, a few FPC > > members had a brainstorming session about it and on Friday, sgallagh and > > that brainstorming continued with sgallagh, adamw, tflink, notting, and > > myself. We came up with a tentative idea here: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/Product_Divergence_(config) > > > > The idea is to allow config file divergence via the alternatives system as > > that already provides us with a commandline tool and some structure to build > > on. We'd still have to write a few pieces to complete the picture but it > > seemed to be a better starting point than using rpm Conflicts between > > config-packages. > > > > Anyone have thoughts on this potential path? > > What will fedup updates of Fedora 20 look like? Would there be a flag, e.g. --product cloud/workstation/server? If not specified do we fail, or is there a default? > > Or is this getting too far ahead of things? > The default should be whatever product was installed onto the system originally. Going from Fedora 20 to a Product in F21 is probably a one-off but I'm not sure what that should look like. I could be totally wrong but I believe that each of the Products will have their own install image. With that in mind, fedup might need a one-off bit of UI to ask which Product image you want to use. That image would then set the Product on the disk accordingly. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpa4BUblk_W_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
