On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:08:40PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:00:25 -0700 > Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Perhaps spins should also specify a product identifier. Maybe they > > could have the ability to specify an existing products' identifier if > > they are merely a variant set of packages top an existing product as > > well. > > But they aren't products... so that would be pretty confusing. > We don't necessarily have to limit the identifier to Official Products. It's purpose is to allow software to differentiate this-thing-that-we-ship-that's-different-than-these-other-things. So it might be that spins fall into this category jsut as much as the Official Products do. > Yeah, if there was some spin built on top of workstation I assume they > would just have the workstation product setup by pulling in the > fedora-workstation-release and such. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp3Wuo4EO_Mf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
