On 03/08/2014 01:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hmmm, I know I'm late to the discussion (and I hadn't thought of it when the
> discussion first came up) couldn't we use something like this
> (foo-dummymain.spec):
>
> Name: foo-dummymain
> ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
> …
> # the actual noarch package built as a noarch subpackage:
> %package -n foo
> BuildArch: noarch
> …
> %files
> # empty list so that foo-dummymain does not get generated
> %files -n foo
> # the actual file list
>
> ? That should give us the best of both worlds.
I don't think that actually works as expected, but I haven't tried it in
a while.
~tom
==
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> OSAS @ Red Hat
University Outreach || Fedora Special Projects || Fedora Legal
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
