drago01 wrote: > Its not about "complaining" can you stop your "they vs. us" attitude? > The spec have been put up for review > and issues where found and the ones that wrote the spec refused to > address them in a meaningful way (or not at all). That's just not true. A revision was uploaded. The GNOME developers did not reply at all to the mail announcing it: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2010-January/011246.html And also, instead of arguing about that historical discussion, how about reevaluating the current situation: * both KDE Plasma and Unity using that spec in production, * KDE Plasma being shipped in many distributions alongside with GNOME, * the fact that Plasma would actively benefit from applications supporting the new spec, and conversely KDE applications from desktop environments supporting it, * Wayland rendering the legacy XEmbed-based spec (that has been used as the interoperability "lingua franca" so far, despite having been deprecated by both sides of the equation) entirely obsolete instead, and thus restarting the discussion? Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
