Am 07.03.2014 18:16, schrieb Dan Williams: > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 00:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> * change requests that would have broken compatibility with the existing >> implementations of the protocol already in wide use for little to no >> practical benefit, such as nitpicking about the names of some D-Bus methods. > > So just because something is in use, but hasn't been standardized or > been through any kind of standardization discussion, it should > automatically be adopted as-is? I think not... in case of changes gaining less to zero -> YES you can't make vague specifications not forbid naming things in a way, wait months and years until it is widely used and then come out and say "oh and now we strictly say how to use it and expect everybody out there to change any existing code" that happens way too often in the open source world while in a company you get instantly fired acting that way and demand all others to sped their time for changes you enforce if you can't prove a very good reason for doing so
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
