On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/06/2014 09:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> >>> Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>>> >>>> I certainly did file a complaint against generic-logos which has >>>> a similar problem with Fedora Board which in turn dismissed my >>>> concern and failed to answer my follow up question and I gave up >>>> on it. That is of course artwork that Fedora itself is upstream >>>> of rather than merely something we package. One would hope that >>>> the new standard applies to concerns outside of U.S as well. >>> >>> >>> That's the crux of the issue, "offensive" is really interpreted as >>> "offensive to people in the USA". That just does not make sense >>> for a worldwide distribution, nor even for an international >>> company. >>> >> >> This statement is blatantly false. > > > And I consider this to be blatantly naive. You will always find somebody who > complains about something and you will always find situations, which were > things are far from being clear. > > Just consider the "F20 swastika background" and a Fedora release once having > been called "Werewulf". As a German, both incidents caused me to "raise an > eye-brow", but weren't worth it to make a fuzz about. > > That said, it would seem common sense to me for FESCO to have contacted some > official representative of the "American Indian People" or the "Cherokee > Nation/People" and ask for their opinion. > > Did this happen? What did these representatives say? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681339#c31 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
