On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > sgallagh wrote: > >>> Seriously? Retiring useful package? Isn't that a bit of >>> overkill? (Yes, I'm grumpy because I'm using Cherokee). >> >> This has been discussed ad nauseam. >> >> The reasoning was that upstream ships imagery that is in violation of >> Fedora's policy not to ship offensive material. [...] > > Considering the inherently political and subjective nature of this, > could those policy terms be clarified so that "offensiveness" is > defined simply by fesco construal? I doubt that this can be defined .. it has to be a case by case basis. For instance we named a release "beefy miracle" and that might have been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but apparently no one cared enough to "officially" complain. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
