On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 15:50:37 +0100, > drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> For instance we named a release "beefy miracle" and that might have >> been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but >> apparently no one cared enough to "officially" complain. > > > That depends on what you mean by official. I believe this issue got raised > for the board. OK I seem to have missed that. > But the issue was raised close to the release, which may have > tilted the decision toward keeping the name. Really? Changing a name has way less of an effect then removing a package (ok removing the package was the "last resort") but still. But anyway my point was rather we have been inconsistent in enforcing this "rule" anyway because everyone else have different opinions on what "offending" means (see Matthews reply) ... so trying to come up with a definition wouldn't really work because some people would be well ... offended ... by the definition of "offended" ... so lets not open this can of worms. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct