On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 08:26 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > >>> I've left a negative karma there, they forgot to add the new nss-util > >>> into overrides list. > >> > >> No, it's been added, but then it was expired: > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/edit?build=nss-util-3.15.5-1.fc20 > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/edit?build=nss-softokn-3.15.5-1.fc20 > >> > >> That's not the problem at all. > >> > >> The problem is that **some** of these 3 overrides were epired, but not > >> all. > >> > >> The three packages need to always be in overrides together, or none of > >> them. > >> > >> Leaving a negative karma to the update won't help fix the problem > >> either. > > > > At least they can get the news IMO. > > That is completely the wrong way to communicate this and it doesn't > "get them the news" and in fact often stops people getting critical > security or stability fixes for a pathetic little game. The way to > communicate this problem is by the mailing lists/email/IRC etc... IE > proper communication channels. To try to communicate by putting > negative karma on updates that have nothing what so ever to do with > actual update needs to stop. In addition, we've been talking about it on #fedora-admin for the past hour, and Remi already notified via email the nss maintainer. Christopher, remember that you and I are in APAC, which means we are already awake when the nss maintainer (in the US) is still sleeping, so he won't "get the news" instantly. Finally, Pierre-Yves just extended the two already expired buildroot overrides, which should fix the problem soon. This would tell you when it's ready: $ koji wait-repo f20-build --build=nss-softokn-3.15.5-1.fc20 --build=nss-util-3.15.5-1.fc20 -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
