Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
>> People do shrink volumes, and this lack of flexibility is an important
>> consideration I feel was ignored in the Server WG decision.
>
> What is the use case for volume shrinking in a server context? Dual boot is a total edge case for servers.

I shrink ext4 filesystems on servers pretty frequently. Most recently because:

*) Received bad information from an end user which required changing
several LVs/FSs.
*) An "oops" situation where a filesystem was incorrectly increased by
an extra order of magnitude
*) Unexpected (e.g. emergency) growth of an application which required
increasing a filesystem and shrinking another (lesser) used
filesystem.

Yes in all three aforementioned cases we had to unmount the ext4
filesystem in order to shrink it, however, we would _not_ have been
able to do this with xfs.

On a semi related note: I grow/shrink JFS2 filesystems (on AIX) all
the time. It would be great if ext4 had online shrink.

-Jacob
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux